Geothermal Ground Loop Length Calculator

A closed-loop ground-source heat pump (GSHP) exchanges heat with the earth through buried piping (the “ground loop”). The loop must be long enough to move the required heat to/from the ground without forcing loop fluid temperatures outside efficient (or safe) operating limits. In professional design, loop sizing is usually done with transient models (and sometimes a thermal response test), but a steady-state, first-pass estimate can still be useful for early feasibility, budgetary planning, or comparing sites/soil conditions.

What this calculator estimates

This calculator estimates an approximate total ground-loop pipe length needed to handle a given design heat transfer rate using a simplified radial conduction model. The result is best interpreted as an order-of-magnitude planning number, not a construction-ready design.

• Design heat load (kW): the peak heat transfer rate the loop must absorb (cooling mode) or provide (heating mode).
• Soil thermal conductivity, k (W/m·K): how readily the ground conducts heat. Higher k generally means shorter required loop length.
• Average ΔT (°C): the allowable average temperature difference between the loop fluid and the undisturbed ground temperature.
• Design factor: a multiplier to add conservatism and account for real-world effects not captured by the simplified equation.

Core formula (steady-state approximation)

The calculator uses a simplified relationship based on cylindrical (radial) conduction from pipe to surrounding ground. In its basic form:

Where:

• L = estimated loop length (m)
• Q = design heat transfer rate (W). If you enter kW, it is converted to W by multiplying by 1000.
• k = soil (effective) thermal conductivity (W/m·K)
• ΔT = average allowable temperature difference between loop fluid and ground (K or °C difference)

A design factor is then applied:

where F is the design factor (dimensionless).

Interpreting the results

• Total loop length: treat the output as total installed pipe length (sum of all circuits). If you plan multiple parallel circuits, you would divide total length by the number of circuits to get a rough per-circuit length (then check against pumping/pressure-drop constraints).
• Longer length is not always “better”: longer loops reduce temperature swing but can increase excavation/drilling cost and pumping energy (more pipe, more head loss), depending on layout.
• ΔT is a design choice: smaller ΔT implies tighter temperature limits (more conservative), which increases required length. Larger ΔT reduces length but may reduce heat pump performance and risk operating outside recommended entering water temperatures.

Worked example

Assume:

• Design heat load: 10 kW (so Q = 10,000 W)
• Soil thermal conductivity: k = 1.2 W/m·K
• Allowable average ΔT: 10 °C
• Design factor: F = 1.1

Baseline length:

L = 10,000 / (2π × 1.2 × 10) ≈ 132.6 m

Apply design factor:

L_design = 132.6 × 1.1 ≈ 145.9 m

So a planning recommendation would be about 146 m of total loop pipe (before considering the specific field configuration, circuiting, and hydraulics).

Typical soil thermal conductivity (rule-of-thumb)

Thermal conductivity varies strongly with moisture content, density, mineral composition, and groundwater movement. Use local geotechnical information when available; otherwise, the following ranges can be used for preliminary estimates:

Choosing ΔT and the design factor

• ΔT (average): Many preliminary calculations use something like 5–15 °C depending on desired entering water temperature range and system type. Smaller values increase length and reduce temperature swing.
• Design factor F: A common planning range is 1.1 to 1.5. Use higher values when: soil properties are uncertain, loads are seasonal-imbalanced, groundwater conditions are unknown, or you want more margin on loop temperatures.

Limitations & assumptions (important)

• Steady-state conduction model: Real ground heat transfer is transient. Temperature plumes grow and recover over time; seasonal effects matter.
• No borefield/trench geometry: Spacing between pipes/boreholes, bore depth, trench depth, and layout strongly affect performance; this model does not distinguish vertical vs horizontal systems.
• No grout/pipe thermal resistance: Pipe diameter, SDR, grout conductivity, and contact resistance can materially change required length.
• No groundwater advection: Moving groundwater can greatly increase effective heat transfer (reducing required length) or create site-specific behavior not captured here.
• Uses a single “average ΔT”: Actual loop fluid temperature varies over the loop and over time; heat pump entering/leaving water temperatures and performance maps are not modeled.
• No hydraulic/pressure-drop check: Circuit length is limited by pumping power and allowable head loss; total length must be divided into circuits appropriately.
• Load definition matters: The “design heat load” should reflect the loop heat transfer rate (which depends on heat pump COP/EER and whether you’re sizing for heating, cooling, or both). This calculator treats the load as the heat transferred to/from the ground.

For construction and permitting, consider recognized design methods and tools (e.g., IGSHPA guidance and ASHRAE methods; software such as GLHEPro/EED) and site-specific data (including thermal response testing for larger systems).